Skip to content
For fTECHNOLOGY & DESIGN
For f
Services
Industries
Solutions & approach
About For f

Start with the work you want to improve.

Discuss your project

LOGISTICS / FIELD GUIDE

Where to start with waiting-time analytics: from gate events to operating changes

Before using a single arrival-to-departure duration, agree on reception, waiting and handling events. Build evidence that shippers and operating teams can use together.

MEASURE WAITING. WITH THE RIGHT EVENTS. ARRIVE + CHECK IN → LOAD + DEPART → CHECK GAPS
Illustrative data and workflow connections, not measured performance.

KEY TAKEAWAY

Trace complete visits at one site and confirm what each event actually means. Keep unknown intervals explicit and report event completeness alongside durations.

1. Separate dwell from waiting

Dwell time includes reception, waiting, handling, inspection and paperwork. Separate these intervals and agree on the treatment of arrivals before booked slots.

This is an operational measurement design. Regulatory reporting needs a separate check against current official applicability and calculation guidance.

2. A vehicle number is not a visit

The same vehicle may visit several times or leave and return. Use a visit identifier built from trip, booking, date and site, with an explicit re-entry rule.

Map different reception and WMS identifiers. Do not silently drop unmatched visits; show their count and reason.

3. Missing is not zero minutes

Without a handling-start event, waiting cannot be calculated. Converting it to zero can make poorly recorded sites appear efficient. Show metrics for complete visits beside the completeness rate for all visits.

Distinguish forgotten entry, unavailable devices and events that do not exist in a site’s workflow; each requires a different intervention.

4. Move from averages to actionable groups

Company averages can improve while specific time windows remain congested. Group by site, customer, load type, weekday and window, showing sample counts.

Reconstructing one long visit with the operating team often produces a more concrete discussion than a chart alone.

5. What the dashboard brief should include

Include event definitions, visit mappings, missing-data and correction rules, and links to original records. The team should know which visit and owner to inspect when totals differ.

Before-and-after periods should account for volume and operating days. One day after deployment is not evidence of sustained improvement.

6. Establish the model at one site

At one site, investigate differences between measured data and operational understanding. Assess manual capture against its workload before expanding to different reception processes.

For f can scope read-only analysis across TMS, WMS and dispatch sheets. Existing reception records and examples of difficult time windows help define the first validation.

A concrete acceptance check

Check identical trips with gate staff and dispatch managers. Acceptance requires agreement on periods and event definitions; sites needing better recording can be separated from implementation scope.

Before commissioning

  • Share event definitions.
  • Define re-entry and multiple-trip identifiers.
  • Show missing-data rates and sample counts.
  • Keep source records accessible in improvement reviews.

YOUR OPERATION / OUR STARTING POINT

Start with the work you do today.

Tell us about the workflow, systems and reporting or documents that need attention. We will define a suitable phase, deliverables and assumptions.

Logistics and transport — discuss your project How scope and estimates work ↗